This is a nice example of a late production M4 Sherman tank. It has the newer suspension and wider tracks and the larger 76mm gun with muzzle brake. My significant other's late father was a gunner in a Sherman with the 4th Armored Division in Europe in WW2.
Im planning on drawing that tank
My ex-girlfriend's late father was a gunner in the Sherman in the 4th Armored Division in WW 2.
That's very interested I respect your ex girlfriends father he went though hell and back and if you want I can make the American tanks first in honor of him and other American soldiers
He had some interesting stories. You can make the tanks in whatever order you want.
I'd love to here the purr of a Sherman's engine sometime.
It's more of a rumble.
The sound also depends on which variant it is. The early ones use a radial aircraft engine and the later ones used a "V" type engine.
It's a firefly not a Sherman
No, it's a late production Sherman with a 76mm gun with a muzzle brake. My roommate's late father was a gunner in the Sherman and he confirmed this and I also checked my references. The Firefly has a 90mm gun with a longer barrel and a much different turret but they based it on the late production welded hull Sherman.
Nope, a Firefly is a US made Sherman with a British 17 pounder anti-tank gun, which is 3 inches or just over 76mm. I'm not an expert, and it's hard to tell from this angle, but the Firefly gun is a bit longer and had more of a punch against armour. The gun mantles are similar and this could be either, there was a lot of mix n match going on during production, although all Fireflies had two hatches atop the turret (I can't tell from this angle). Most Fireflies had dazzle camouflage on the end of the barrel to disguise them since they could take out a Tiger or a Panther and the Germans began targeting them more aggressively. Did you notice if it had a rotary engine or a V8? To my knowledge non of the Fireflies got the Ford engines.
You're right about the Firefly. The barrel was substantially longer and they had an addition on the back of the turret to counterbalance the longer barrel. This is definitely an M4A3E8 with a 76mm with a muzzle brake. So far as I know, the Firefly was exclusive to the British armored forces. They did have a program to put a 90mm on the Sherman in the US, but it was canceled and then revived after the experiences with German armor. The introduction of the Pershing negated the need to add the 90mm to the Sherman.
Well there was the M36 tank hunter which was a 90mm on a Sherman chassis, and they produced around 1800 of those if I recall correctly. The main reason I doubted this is an A3E8 is because there is no bellows visible on the gun mantle, as there is on the image in David Porter's Essential Vehicle Identification Guide; a quick search of Wikipedia shows a picture of an M4A3E8 at the Patton Museum of Cavalry and Armor, Fort Knox, Kentucky, and it has the same mantle as this image, which leads me to believe that the bellows may have been removed on both, or there may have been two variants of the M4A3E8.
Not all of them had the bellows and it may have not been put on this example. There was only one factory variant of the M4A3E8, but there may have been plenty of field modifications. The bellows may have been removed in the field to ease maintenance and the fact that the canvas tended to rot in wet weather. The M36 was a tank destroyer, as they called them back then, but didn't have the heavier armor of the Sherman. The M36 was designed for "shoot and scoot" tactics. I've seen a lot of photos of the Sherman M4A3E8 without the bellows, which leads me to believe that the crews removed them in the field.
That would make sense. As to the M36, in your original comment you'd said something about a Sherman with a 90, a description which the M36 sort of fits.
What happened was there was a program started to upgun the Sherman early on but it was cancelled and then restarted after the invasion. It was strictly a test program. The M36 used the Sherman chassis, along with more than a few other adaptations, but was not a tank per se, rather a tank destroyer, which was designed to move in, destroy some tanks and then get out, since they didn't have the heavier armor plating. They were a stopgap measure until a tank that could go up against the Panthers was introduced, which was the Pershing, which was introduced late in the war but was very effective against the German armor.
It what events this taken? Is it in anniversary of World War II?
It was taken at the Mid-Atlantic Air Museum's World War 2 Weekend in 2000. It's an annual event. The museum is located at the regional airport in Reading, Pennsylvania.
Was this down Reading? I haven't seen a Sherman down there the last few years.
Yeah. It was at the WW 2 weekend they have there.
Oh I know, I go down every year. I just couldn't find a Sherman. Plenty of German units however.
I haven't been there in a long time. This Sherman was parked at the entrance. One of these days. I'd go but every time it comes around, it's always so goddamned hot that weekend and I don't get along with hot weather very well.
This is one of my favorite tanks.
My significant other's late father was a gunner in the Sherman in the 4th Armored Division during WW 2.
still, it was way better against the japaness tanks
True, but the 76mm gun did help.
My significant other's late father was gunner in a Sherman in the 4th Armored Division during WW 2.
Damn it...i was born in the wrong country and 80 years late... xD
The Sherman had its flaws. The early ones tended to catch fire rather easily until they changed the ammo storage system. It also was undergunned compared to the German Panthers and Tigers. It was comparable to the Pkfw IV. The 76mm gun helped but it still had trouble with the German tanks.
Great picture! I love this tank. Wow, you know someone from the 4th AD, that's so awesome! I read the book "He Rode Up Front for Patton" by Albin Irzyk and "Patton's Vanguard" by Don Fox. John S Wood was a fantastic general and the soldiers under him performed brilliantly in combat.